Attorney Rebekah M. Nett responds to Catholic Judge Dreher and her Order to Show Cause

Attorney Rebekah M. Nett hereby responds to the Order to Show Cause against her as follows:

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The facts are that on November 17, 2011 I reported for a hearing in the matter of Yehud-Monosson USA, Inc. at 1:20 – 1:25 p.m. Upon speaking to a clerk in the courtroom, I learned that the hearing noticed for 1:30 p.m. had already taken place.  Subsequently, Judge Dreher’s law clerk came out to talk with me, and told me that there had been confusion as to why nobody was present on behalf of Debtor but that the judge had not wanted to proceed without Debtor present.  Nobody raised the concern that the matter had been noticed for 1:30 p.m. and not 1:00 p.m. The judge asked if we could have a hearing at 4:00 p.m. that same day. Unfortunately, I had prior commitments I was unable to change, and I asked if we could have the hearing the next morning. Apparently that did not work with the court’s schedule. Judge Dreher’s law clerk returned to chambers to see what could be worked out. On his return, he advised me that he had contacted the scheduling clerk and learned that Trustee Nauni Manty had made the scheduling mistake in that she had scheduled the matter for 1:00 p.m. on the court’s calendar, but she had noticed the matter for 1:30 p.m. in the Notice of Hearing, which is all Debtor had to rely on.  Further, he indicated she had already scheduled another hearing for December 6, 2011.  He suggested that we leave the matter scheduled for that date since we couldn’t have a hearing at 4:00 p.m. the same day or first thing the next morning.

The following day, November 18, 2011 Judge Dreher issued an Order in response to the November 17, 2011 hearing at which nobody for Debtor was present.  In that Order, the Court indicated that the U.S. Trustee Colin Kreuziger had also been present at the 1:00 p.m. hearing on November 17th. This immediately raised a stir as previously I had understood that the matter was simply a typographical mistake on the part of Ms. Manty’s office.  However, the U.S. Trustee would also have been served with the same Notice of Hearing that Debtor received through ECF filing.  Therefore, how did he know to show up for a hearing at 1:00 p.m. instead of 1:30 p.m.?  Furthermore, it was apparent from paragraph 2 of the Order that the trustee’s counsel had presented argument in support of her motion for contempt at the November 17th hearing. The Court’s Order in response permitted the Trustee to make a record at the continued hearing that meets the test for a finding of contempt. Review of the audio transcript of that hearing confirmed this.

Debtor’s principal officer believes that the meaning of paragraph 2 is that the trustee will be permitted to make a record that Naomi Isaacson had notice of the Court’s October 7, 2011 Order for Turnover in this case and by that record alone, it would be confirmed that she was in contempt of the Turnover Order and subject to immediate arrest from the courtroom. The Debtor and Ms. Isaacson believed this wholeheartedly and still does in fact.   Debtor believes that the outcome of this case has been essentially predetermined all along and that the Court and trustees are all bound and determined to simply harm and destroy the Debtor because of who its shareholder is.  (It’s shareholder is Dr. R.C. Samanta Roy Institute of Science and Technology, Inc. – a non-profit organization (“SIST”). The president of that organization is Dr. Avraham Cohen, a person outside the mainstream who has been attacked by Jesuit controlled mainstream media for three and one-half decades.

In the local area he resided in for many years in Wisconsin, numerous individuals and organizations connected with him have been targeted with rumors, negative publicity, and unfavorable municipal or court decisions under “color of law” – in other words, the outcome of the authority figure’s decision is justified by a seemingly non-biased reason; however, in comparison to other similar situations and by sheer repetition, it is apparent that the authority figures, whether City officials or local judges, go out of their way to find a “non-biased” reason to rule against these people’s favor. In fact, this is common knowledge in the community of Shawano, Wisconsin but most average people don’t want to speak out for fear of also being targeted. This discrimination became most heated subsequent to Lorna Marquardt’s election as Mayor of Shawano in April 2002. Debtor believes that Lorna Marquardt has made it her prerogative to put SIST out of operation entirely. Furthermore, Debtor believes that Lorna Marquardt is associated with the Free Masons, another secret society that also ultimately assists the Jesuit Order……

To read the document filed with the court, in its entirety, please click Docket 220 Response to Order to Show Cause – RN.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s