Naomi Isaacson, Debtor’s representative, hereby responds to the Order to Show Cause as follows:
- I am the President of the Debtor, Yehud-Monosson USA, Inc. Presently, the matter is assigned to Minnesota Bankruptcy Judge Nancy Dreher. Colin Kreuziger represents the Office of the United States Trustee in this matter. Nauni Manty is the appointed Chapter 7 Trustee. Following a secret hearing, Nancy Dreher issued an order by default. Debtor filed a motion to vacate said illegal order. The Motion to Vacate outlined the reasons for said request. Instead of vacating the illegal order, Nancy Dreher issued an Order to Show Cause as to why I, as Debtor’s representative, should not be sanctioned. The response follows.
- The Order to Show Cause demands that I show cause as to why I should not be sanctioned for the following statement. The response is as follows:
“Chapter 7 Trustee Nauni Manty had actually scheduled the hearing with Nancy Dreher, the Catholic judge, for 1:00 p.m. but sent notice to the Debtor that the hearing was set for 1:30 p.m.”
The above statement is true and correct and certainly not made for any improper purpose. Chapter 7 Trustee Nauni Manty filed her Motion for Contempt along with Notice of Hearing on November 2, 2011. Both the court filing confirmation notice and Trustee Manty’s Notice of Hearing stated that the hearing time was November 17, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. (See Docket No. 187). All interested parties in the case, including Colin Kreuziger received the same notice setting the hearing time for 1:30. On November 17th, counsel for the Debtor was advised by the judge’s clerk that Trustee Manty had in fact scheduled the hearing with the Court for 1:00 p.m. The statement that was made was based upon the facts as presented by Nancy Dreher’s clerk. Debtor would have no way of knowing if her clerk was lying but reasonably relied upon the statements made to Debtor’s counsel.
With respect to the reference to Nancy Dreher, the Catholic judge, that statement is indeed true and accurate. In referring to Nancy Dreher as being a “Catholic judge”, it is not referring to being a member of the Roman Catholic Church. It is referring to a mentality and an adherence to a universal creed of White Supremacy. “Catholic” also refers to membership in the universal Christian faith. All Christians have a creed: a belief in the father, son, and holy ghost. They believe that no one has rights to “heaven” except through their dirty book. They hold the patent to “god” and can go to every nation on earth to force their vomit down everyone’s throat. Nancy Dreher cleverly asserts that she is not “Catholic” in the sense that she claims not to be a member of the Roman Catholic Church, but she cannot deny her “catholic” mentality or catholic Christian origin which dictates a person’s entire life. Only “White Christians” have a right to life, and whether or not any minority has any rights is in the White Christians’ sole discretion. Even now, even though Nancy Dreher was clearly wrong in holding a secret hearing, she still stubbornly asserts she is right. That is the catholic mentality of a Christian. Nancy Dreher certainly is not Hindu, Muslim, Jewish, or Buddhist. Nor is she an atheist. If she were an atheist, at least one could expect to see some justice……
To read the document filed with the court, in its entirety, please click Docket 219 Response to Order to Show Cause – NI.
- Naomi Isaacson: URGENT INVESTIGATION REQUIRED (promoteliberty.wordpress.com)